<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pisteos Christou and the Subjective Gentive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/</link>
	<description>Taylor&#039;s Marshall&#039;s Next Book &#38; Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 05:27:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Språkleg småplukk: ?????? ??????? &#124; Katolikken</title>
		<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>Språkleg småplukk: ?????? ??????? &#124; Katolikken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>[...] å lese meir om ?????? ???????, sjå her og [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] å lese meir om ?????? ???????, sjå her og [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glennie Vangilder</title>
		<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Glennie Vangilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>Hello. fantastic job. I did not anticipate this. This is a excellent story. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. fantastic job. I did not anticipate this. This is a excellent story. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: best impact wrench</title>
		<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>best impact wrench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>I like your style, the fact that your site is a little bit different makes it so interesting, I get fed up of seeing same-old-same-old all of the time. I&#039;ve just stumbled this page for you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your style, the fact that your site is a little bit different makes it so interesting, I get fed up of seeing same-old-same-old all of the time. I&#8217;ve just stumbled this page for you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blowjob pov</title>
		<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>blowjob pov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 05:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>Important Message: Conserve your toilet paper - use both sides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important Message: Conserve your toilet paper &#8211; use both sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennie Shorten</title>
		<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennie Shorten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still learning from you, while I&#039;m making my way to the top as well. I absolutely enjoy reading everything that is posted on your site.Keep the tips coming. I enjoyed it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still learning from you, while I&#8217;m making my way to the top as well. I absolutely enjoy reading everything that is posted on your site.Keep the tips coming. I enjoyed it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Språkleg småplukk: ?????? ??????? &#171; Evkaristi</title>
		<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Språkleg småplukk: ?????? ??????? &#171; Evkaristi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-503</guid>
		<description>[...] å lese meir om ?????? ???????, sjå her og [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] å lese meir om ?????? ???????, sjå her og [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-455</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not trained in Greek but I find the arguments for &quot;the faithfulness of Christ&quot; very convincing. Only if it was Christ&#039;s own obedience unto death can justification be all of God, all by grace. But even if &lt;i&gt;our&lt;/i&gt; faith is meant it could well mean our faithfulness, our &lt;a href=&quot;http://criticalbelief.com/2010/05/10/faith-is-faithfulness-is-loving-obedience/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;loving obedience&lt;/a&gt;. Indeed I would say initial justification in the present is all of Christ, final justification is our work in Christ, by the Spirit, for the Father. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://criticalbelief.com/2010/04/21/the-false-antithesis-of-faith-and-works/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;false antithesis of faith and works&lt;/a&gt; which Luther proposed is thereby a Big Mistake for all the good man&#039;s virtues and achievements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not trained in Greek but I find the arguments for &#8220;the faithfulness of Christ&#8221; very convincing. Only if it was Christ&#8217;s own obedience unto death can justification be all of God, all by grace. But even if <i>our</i> faith is meant it could well mean our faithfulness, our <a href="http://criticalbelief.com/2010/05/10/faith-is-faithfulness-is-loving-obedience/" rel="nofollow">loving obedience</a>. Indeed I would say initial justification in the present is all of Christ, final justification is our work in Christ, by the Spirit, for the Father. The <a href="http://criticalbelief.com/2010/04/21/the-false-antithesis-of-faith-and-works/" rel="nofollow">false antithesis of faith and works</a> which Luther proposed is thereby a Big Mistake for all the good man&#8217;s virtues and achievements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Anton</title>
		<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Is there any evidence for the subjective genitive view in the fathers or doctors? If pistis Christou has always been read as an objective genitive and if it is only a suggestion of modern scholarship to read it subjectively, then it seems to me that Catholics should defend the objective genitive... which still seems to be the predominant view even in modern scholarship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any evidence for the subjective genitive view in the fathers or doctors? If pistis Christou has always been read as an objective genitive and if it is only a suggestion of modern scholarship to read it subjectively, then it seems to me that Catholics should defend the objective genitive&#8230; which still seems to be the predominant view even in modern scholarship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

