Taylor's Marshall's Next Book & Podcast Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:43:35 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-503 Språkleg småplukk: ?????? ??????? « Evkaristi Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:29:23 +0000 http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-503 [...] å lese meir om ?????? ???????, sjå her og [...] [...] å lese meir om ?????? ???????, sjå her og [...]

]]> http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-455 Marc Wed, 19 May 2010 08:40:44 +0000 http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-455 I'm not trained in Greek but I find the arguments for "the faithfulness of Christ" very convincing. Only if it was Christ's own obedience unto death can justification be all of God, all by grace. But even if <i>our</i> faith is meant it could well mean our faithfulness, our <a href="http://criticalbelief.com/2010/05/10/faith-is-faithfulness-is-loving-obedience/" rel="nofollow">loving obedience</a>. Indeed I would say initial justification in the present is all of Christ, final justification is our work in Christ, by the Spirit, for the Father. The <a href="http://criticalbelief.com/2010/04/21/the-false-antithesis-of-faith-and-works/" rel="nofollow">false antithesis of faith and works</a> which Luther proposed is thereby a Big Mistake for all the good man's virtues and achievements. I’m not trained in Greek but I find the arguments for “the faithfulness of Christ” very convincing. Only if it was Christ’s own obedience unto death can justification be all of God, all by grace. But even if our faith is meant it could well mean our faithfulness, our loving obedience. Indeed I would say initial justification in the present is all of Christ, final justification is our work in Christ, by the Spirit, for the Father. The false antithesis of faith and works which Luther proposed is thereby a Big Mistake for all the good man’s virtues and achievements.

]]> http://pauliscatholic.com/2009/08/pistis-christou-the-subjective-gentive-and-christs-so-called-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-212 Emil Anton Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:34:34 +0000 http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=284#comment-212 Is there any evidence for the subjective genitive view in the fathers or doctors? If pistis Christou has always been read as an objective genitive and if it is only a suggestion of modern scholarship to read it subjectively, then it seems to me that Catholics should defend the objective genitive... which still seems to be the predominant view even in modern scholarship. Is there any evidence for the subjective genitive view in the fathers or doctors? If pistis Christou has always been read as an objective genitive and if it is only a suggestion of modern scholarship to read it subjectively, then it seems to me that Catholics should defend the objective genitive… which still seems to be the predominant view even in modern scholarship.

]]>