<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;Elemental Spirits&#8221; of the Apostle Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pauliscatholic.com/2007/05/the-elemental-spirits-of-the-apostle-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Taylor&#039;s Marshall&#039;s Next Book &#38; Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:43:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brant Pitre</title>
		<link>http://pauliscatholic.com/2007/05/the-elemental-spirits-of-the-apostle-paul/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Brant Pitre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pauliscatholic.com/?p=80#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Taylor,

You&#039;ve put your finger on one of my FAVORITE topics in Pauline studies: Paul and the Angelic Powers (the &quot;elemental spirits&quot;). Be sure to re-read Colossians with this in mind is well; I am convinced it is the key to much of what he says. When you say you&#039;re &quot;not sure what to do with it,&quot; I&#039;m not totally sure either, but I do know that the key to understanding it is the important substratum to Paul&#039;s thought: the inauguration of the New Creation in Christ. He appears to teach that both Jews and Gentiles were under the power of angelic spirits in the Old Creation; the Jews apparently good angels (like Michael; Dan 12:1-2), and the Gentiles wicked fallen angels (I&#039;m thinking here 1 Cor 10: &quot;What the Gentiles sacrifice, they offer to demons&quot;). But through Baptism into Christ, Christians become part of the New Creation, where they are no longer subject to these spirits (cf. Gal 3 esp.) In Christ, we are actually elevated ABOVE the angels, who now minister to us (cf. Heb 1). This is why Paul can say, I think: &quot;Don&#039;t you know that we will judge the angels?&quot; (1 Cor 6). Anyway, most people have missed the importance of this theme in Pauline thought. It was Albert Schweitzer&#039;s masterpiece, THe Mysticism of Paul the Apostle, which turned me on to it. Even though Schweitzer gets some stuff wrong, he&#039;s always brilliant, and puts his finger on this one.

May the angels be with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve put your finger on one of my FAVORITE topics in Pauline studies: Paul and the Angelic Powers (the &#8220;elemental spirits&#8221;). Be sure to re-read Colossians with this in mind is well; I am convinced it is the key to much of what he says. When you say you&#8217;re &#8220;not sure what to do with it,&#8221; I&#8217;m not totally sure either, but I do know that the key to understanding it is the important substratum to Paul&#8217;s thought: the inauguration of the New Creation in Christ. He appears to teach that both Jews and Gentiles were under the power of angelic spirits in the Old Creation; the Jews apparently good angels (like Michael; Dan 12:1-2), and the Gentiles wicked fallen angels (I&#8217;m thinking here 1 Cor 10: &#8220;What the Gentiles sacrifice, they offer to demons&#8221;). But through Baptism into Christ, Christians become part of the New Creation, where they are no longer subject to these spirits (cf. Gal 3 esp.) In Christ, we are actually elevated ABOVE the angels, who now minister to us (cf. Heb 1). This is why Paul can say, I think: &#8220;Don&#8217;t you know that we will judge the angels?&#8221; (1 Cor 6). Anyway, most people have missed the importance of this theme in Pauline thought. It was Albert Schweitzer&#8217;s masterpiece, THe Mysticism of Paul the Apostle, which turned me on to it. Even though Schweitzer gets some stuff wrong, he&#8217;s always brilliant, and puts his finger on this one.</p>
<p>May the angels be with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
